Evidence of sexual acquisition of hepatitis C virus (HCV) among men who  have sex with men (MSM) receiving pre-exposure prophylaxis through a San  Francisco clinic has prompted a call for routine monitoring for the  virus among PrEP users. In a letter to the editor in Clinical Infectious  Diseases, clinicians from Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical  Center describe new cases of hep C among two men out of 485 HIV-negative MSM receiving PrEP at the clinic between February 2011 and December 2014.
Considering  the infections occurred during 304 person-years of follow-up, the hep C  incidence rate was 0.7 per 100 person-years. This infection rate is  lower than those observed among populations of HIV-positive MSM in  published research. But the two cases add evidence to previous findings that the risk of sexual transmission of hep C is likely not reserved to  those who are living with HIV. Additionally, however small the risk of  hep C may be, its existence adds to the larger dialogue about having sex  without a condom while on PrEP (or not on it, for that matter).
Read more... 
Welcome to HCV Advocate’s hepatitis blog. The intent of this blog is to keep our website audience up-to-date on information about hepatitis and to answer some of our web site and training audience questions. People are encouraged to submit questions and post comments.
For more information on how to use this blog, the HCV drug pipeline, and for more information on HCV clinical trials click here
Be sure to check out our other blogs: The HBV Advocate Blog and Hepatitis & Tattoos.
Alan Franciscus
  Editor-in-Chief
  HCV Advocate
Thursday, February 19, 2015
Hepatitis C drug patent challenged in Europe
A French healthcare campaign group has launched a legal challenge to the patent covering Sovaldi (sofosbuvir), the blockbuster hepatitis C virus (HCV) drug marketed by Gilead. Médecins du Monde (MDM) has told the European Patent Office (EPO) ‘the molecule itself is not sufficiently innovative to warrant a patent’.
HCV infection can clear within a few months. But for about 80% of those infected, it develops into a chronic condition. According to the World Health Organization, 130–150 million people are living with chronic HCV infection.
Read more...
HCV infection can clear within a few months. But for about 80% of those infected, it develops into a chronic condition. According to the World Health Organization, 130–150 million people are living with chronic HCV infection.
Read more...
Canada: Campaigns launched to promote awareness of and try to prevent Hep C infections in Guelph area
                            GUELPH—About 300,000 Canadians have  potentially deadly Hepatitis C, including 100,000 in Ontario, but up to  50 per cent don't know they're harboring the harmful viral infection,  area Hep C Dr. Chris Steingart told a Guelph audience Thursday.                         
The Sanguen Health Centre executive director  said the infection from tainted blood from a variety of sources, which  attacks the liver, can cause physical, mental and emotional injury, yet  each year more people are infected than seek treatment. 
"The good news is we can do something about that," Steingart told  audience members in the health care/harm reduction field at the launch  of an information video and color-coded syringes program. He stressed  the local availability of effective Hep C testing and treatment.                          
Labels:
Canada,
Guelph,
Harm Reduction
Researchers tackle gaps in hepatitis C treatment
“Do One Thing” seeks to provide screenings, treatment to underserved communities
A program run by University researchers  aims to quickly identify and provide comprehensive treatment for  medically underserved patients who are chronically infected with the  hepatitis C virus, according to a new study published in the Feb. 14  issue of the Journal of General Internal Medicine.
Hepatitis C — a blood-borne disease that  inflames the liver — is an “underfunded, understudied and seriously  large health problem,” said Amy Nunn, assistant professor of behavioral  and social sciences and medicine, who co-authored the study. 
“Its magnitude is not to be  underestimated and there are at least five to seven times as many people  living with hepatitis C than its more infamous counterpart, HIV,” Nunn  said. Unlike for hepatitis A and B, there is no vaccination available  for hepatitis C. 
Reallocation; ACOs; ABLE Accounts (Update on Federal Government Actions) Jacques Chambers, CLU
This column  normally focuses on benefits issues,  not politics; but government actions have  a large impact on benefits  and the disabled persons who receive them. This  month’s article takes a  look at three actions by the federal government that  directly affect  people dealing with disability, namely: 
-                       Reallocation of funds between Social Security trust funds, which could have a dramatic effect on anyone collecting Social Security Disability;
-                       Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) under Obamacare which looks to become an effective tool at reducing medical costs; and,
-                       Enactment of ABLE accounts, a recent federal law which could help disabled persons save money tax-free.
Reallocation of  Trust Funds 
This is the item that could have the quickest and most severe impact on people collecting Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI).
This is the item that could have the quickest and most severe impact on people collecting Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI).
A little  background: The  F.I.C.A. payroll taxes that pay Social Security Retirement and   Disability beneficiaries go into two separate trust funds, the  Retirement Trust  Fund and the Disability Trust Fund. They are split by a  formula that has been  in effect for many years. 
Because the  formula does not accurately reflect the payouts from each  fund,  periodically, the House of Representatives, which initiates budget   issues, must “reallocate” funds from one trust fund to the other in  order to  maintain full payments to both groups of beneficiaries. This  is usually a  fairly routine procedure and has been done eleven times  since 1968 with no  opposition or problems, regardless of the political  party in control of the  House. Due to the age of the allocation formula  and the shifts in types of  labor, age of workforce, and advancing the  retirement age to 67, the  reallocation of funds usually has been from  the Retirement Fund into the  Disability Fund. 
If there is  no reallocation of  money into the Disability Trust Fund from the much larger  Retirement  Fund, before December, 2016, SSDI benefits will be cut 16 – 20% for the  11,000,000  disabled people currently receiving benefits.
On the first  day of the new  Congress, the new majority adopted a “rule” about reallocation  without  consulting the minority party. Instead of simply approving the   reallocation as in the past, now a reallocation bill can only be  considered if  it comes with an accompanying proposal which “improves  the actuarial balance”  of both funds. In other words, disabled people’s  SSDI benefits will be cut by  up to 1/5 unless there is a plan on the  table to put both Trust Funds into more  permanent solvency, i.e., a  major rewrite of the entire Social Security  retirement and disability  system.
Note that  this is only a “rule”  change, not a law. So it is now in effect; neither the  Senate nor the  President can do anything to stop it. 
Supporters  of this new rule  have frequently tried to portray SSDI as too easy to get and  claim  almost anyone can walk in and get it. Any disabled person who has gone   through the application and appeal process will have no problem  appreciating  the total inaccuracy of that. 
One senator  maintains that over  half the recipients are either anxious or have a sore back,  saying,  “Join the club. Who doesn’t get up a little anxious for work and their   back hurts.” 
In 2011, the  last year for when numbers are available, all  types of mood disorders plus all types of musculoskeletal issues comprised less than 45% of total worker   beneficiaries, which includes far more conditions than anxiety and a  “sore  back.”
The reason  for the new rule, according to its  supporters, is to push Congress to address  the inadequacy of current  revenue and benefits payouts and stop “kicking the  can down the road.”
Those  opposed to the new rules, which include  virtually all of the disabled community  and its advocates, accused the  House of holding the disabled hostage. Who is  correct? 
While the  supporters focused on  anecdotes, the Government Accounting Office (GAO)  performed an audit  of improper SSDI payments and issued its report in 2013  (GAO13-635). It  concluded only 0.4% of beneficiaries received overpayments, or   payments for which they were not able–not even 1% of the total benefits  paid.
The proposed  budget recently  issued by The White House specifically calls for a reallocation  into  the Disability Trust Fund, but that is only a proposal at present.
There is a  possibility that, if  pushed, the majority in the House may postpone this rule,  however,  that risks the rule or something like it being brought up in future   years similar to other issues such as expanding the debt limit or  threatening  to cut successful, popular, and necessary programs. At  present the rule is in  place, and, if not changed or postponed, SSDI  beneficiaries will see a large  cut in their benefits by the end of  2016.
Accountable Care  Organizations (ACOs)
One of the provisions of the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) created ACOs in an attempt to control the rapidly rising medical costs. An ACO is a group of doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers who come together voluntarily to give coordinated high quality care to their patients. This would save costs by avoiding unnecessary duplication of services and prevent medical errors.
One of the provisions of the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) created ACOs in an attempt to control the rapidly rising medical costs. An ACO is a group of doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers who come together voluntarily to give coordinated high quality care to their patients. This would save costs by avoiding unnecessary duplication of services and prevent medical errors.
The goal of  coordinated care is  to ensure that patients, especially the chronically ill  such as those  with HCV and HIV, get the right care at the right time. When an  ACO  succeeds both in delivering high quality care AND spending health care   dollars more wisely, it will share in the savings it achieves.
This may  sound a little like  the HMO model for health care, and the goals are definitely  similar in  that it attempts to move away from paying by the treatment provided   (fee-for-service) and tie payment more to health outcomes. What  separates an  ACO from an HMO is the patient is not locked in to any set  of providers or  hospitals where they must go for treatment.  Beneficiaries can still go to any  doctor or hospital.  
Under the  terms of Obamacare,  the ACO will be responsible for all the care needs for a  group of  patients and will be paid based on those patients’ health outcomes,   satisfaction, and costs.
At present,  ACOs are primarily  being tried with beneficiaries who are on original, (or   fee-for-service) Medicare. Private insurance companies are watching  closely and  are also starting to work with it on a smaller scale.  Kaiser Health News  reports that Medicare ACOs are already serving over  one million Medicare  recipients with promising results. For an  interactive map showing current  Medicare ACOs, see the site below:  http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/sharedsavingsprogram/
ACOs-in-Your-State.html
ACOs-in-Your-State.html
By having  the various medical  providers working together more closely, health outcomes  will be  improved, there will be less wasted dollars from duplicate and   unnecessary procedures being performed, fewer and shorter hospital  stays, and  greater patient satisfaction. The indications so far are  good.
ABLE Savings  Accounts
In December, 2014, Congress passed and the President signed the Achieving a Better Life Experience (ABLE) Act. Similar to the tax-sheltered 529 College Savings Accounts, it allows people with disabilities to establish a tax-sheltered fund to assist with expenses.
In December, 2014, Congress passed and the President signed the Achieving a Better Life Experience (ABLE) Act. Similar to the tax-sheltered 529 College Savings Accounts, it allows people with disabilities to establish a tax-sheltered fund to assist with expenses.
To qualify,  a person must have  been diagnosed by age 26 with a disability that results in  “marked and  severe functional limitations;” those receiving Social Security   disability benefits would also qualify. Note that there is no age limit  to  establishing the fund, but diagnosis of the condition must have  occurred while  the disabled beneficiary is age 26 or less. While this  would eliminate anyone  diagnosed with HCV after age 26, it could be a  significant tool for those who  are eligible. 
The  beneficiary, family, and  friends could set up and fund a tax-free at financial  institutions,  depositing up to $14,000 per year. Funds could be used for  housing,  health care expenses, transportation, education, employment training,   personal support services, financial management, and administrative  services.  The contributions would be with after-tax dollars but  earnings would grow  tax-free.
The maximum  amount of the fund  would be the same as each state’s maximum for the 529  Education  Tax-Free Funds. A major advantage is that as long as the fund remains   below $100,000, the beneficiary would still be eligible for Supplemental   Security Income (SSI) benefits. Regardless of the fund size,  eligibility for Medicaid  would continue.
The ABLE  Fund would have  significant advantages over the Special Needs Trust, currently  used to  maintain eligibility for needs-based public programs. They are much   less expensive to set up, and they do not have the significant  limitations on  the use of the funds. 
For more information contact a financial planner or a banker. States may also set up funding plans as they do with the Education Accounts.
http://hcvadvocate.org/news/newsLetter/2015/advocate0215_mid.html#4
Wednesday, February 18, 2015
Texas needs needle exchange program
A needle exchange program to help reduce the spread of HIV and hepatitis C may finally be a reality for Bexar County.
 
The launch of what is sometimes referred to as harm reduction programs was first attempted in 2008. At issue was vagueness in the wording of the law that exposed participants in the program to possible prosecution under state drug laws for possession of drug paraphernalia.
  
 
Rep. Ruth Jones-McClendon, D-San Antonio, has introduced HB 65, which would allow for pilot needle exchange programs in Bexar, Dallas, El Paso, Harris, Nueces, Travis and Webb counties. It provides for the the exchange of needles and syringes, education about communicable diseases such as HIV, hepatitis B and hepatitis C, and helps program participants access substance abuse and treatment and bloodborne disease testing.
Read more...
The launch of what is sometimes referred to as harm reduction programs was first attempted in 2008. At issue was vagueness in the wording of the law that exposed participants in the program to possible prosecution under state drug laws for possession of drug paraphernalia.
Rep. Ruth Jones-McClendon, D-San Antonio, has introduced HB 65, which would allow for pilot needle exchange programs in Bexar, Dallas, El Paso, Harris, Nueces, Travis and Webb counties. It provides for the the exchange of needles and syringes, education about communicable diseases such as HIV, hepatitis B and hepatitis C, and helps program participants access substance abuse and treatment and bloodborne disease testing.
Read more...
Labels:
HB 65,
needle exchange,
Texas
The Five: Sleep and Insomnia —Alan Franciscus, Editor-in-Chief
A good night’s sleep  is a critical component of  living healthy especially with hepatitis C.  As any insomiac will tell  you, getting a  restful night’s sleep may be one of the most difficult  goals to achieve, but  man when you get one it’s like achieving  nirvana!  
Recently, the National  Sleep  Foundation released new recommendations for Americans of every age.   While these are recommendations, there are  always reasons why people  may require more sleep than recommended.  For instance, if you have an  illness or are  being treated for hepatitis C your body needs more sleep  than recommended to  heal and recover. 
1. The National Sleep Foundation recommends the  following hours of sleep every day:  
-                       Newborns (0-3 months): 14-17 hours
-                       Infants (4-11 months): 12-15 hours
-                       Toddlers (1-2 years): 11-14 hours
-                       Preschoolers (3-5 years): 10-13 hours
-                       School-age children (6-13): 9-11 hours
-                       Teenagers (14-17): 8-10 hours
-                       Young Adults & Adults (18-64): 7-9 hours
-                       Older Adults (65+): 7-8 hours
2. Causes of insomnia: There are many causes  of insomnia or sleeplessness including:   
-                       Living with hepatitis C and the uncertainty of life with a potentially deadly illness
-                       People who are on HCV treatment may worry about being cured
-                       Sleep Apnea (a medical condition that interferes with people’s breathing while they sleep)
-                       Certain prescribed and over-the-counter medications
-                       A sleeping partner who snores or is restless (including pets)
-                       Too much alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, too little or too much food before bedtime
-                       Change in work schedule
-                       Traveling long distances, travel across time zones, and many, many more reasons
3. Complications of                      Insomnia: 
-                       Anxiety and depression
-                       Slow reaction times and poor work performance
-                       Irritability
-                       Increased risk for high blood pressure, heart disease, and diabetes
-                       Substance use
-                       Overeating and obesity that could lead to fatty liver
4. Self-Help Tips: 
-                       Limit caffeine, soda, tea, chocolate
-                       Avoid or cut back on alcohol and tobacco especially too close to bedtime
-                       Go to bed the same time every night. Have a consistent routine when preparing for bed—brush teeth, read a book—this tells your mind and body you are ready for bed
-                       Make sure your bed/pillow is comfortable
-                       Don’t go to bed hungry, but don’t eat a large meal too close to bedtime
-                       Use earplugs and eye masks to block noise and light if needed.
-                       Turn off your mind when going to sleep—try relaxation techniques and tapes
-                       If you cannot sleep, get up do something boring and go back to bed.
5. Medical care:  There are many  over-the-counter and prescription medications that can  treat chronic  insomnia.  People who suffer from chronic  insomnia can  benefit from a sleep study to determine if they have sleep apnea  or  another sleep disorder.  A symptom of  sleep apnea is being tired during  the day—the same symptom that is the most  common symptom of hepatitis  C.  Treating  sleep apnea can improve everyone’s quality of life  especially those with  hepatitis C.
Don’t live your life  full of  sleepless nights—practice self-help strategies and get medical help as   needed to live life to the fullest.  No  one should live a life full of  sleepless nights and days full of being  tired.  Get tested. Get  treated. Get  Cured.  
Check Out These Sleep and Insomnia 
Fact Sheets
Fact Sheets
http://hcvadvocate.org/news/newsLetter/2015/advocate0215_mid.html#3
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
 
 
