Abstract: Low Risk of Liver Decompensation among Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Hepatitis C Virus-Coinfected Patients with Mild Fibrosis in the Short-Term.
Authors: J Macias et al. Hepatology. 2014 Dec 24. doi: 10.1002/hep.27674. [Epub ahead of print]
Authors: J Macias et al. Hepatology. 2014 Dec 24. doi: 10.1002/hep.27674. [Epub ahead of print]
Editorial Comments: I find this study interesting and valuable. But I think it is a dangerous game to play. This is a population of patients who typically have faster disease progression—faster than people who are monoinfected. It may be safe if people are followed very carefully. But wouldn’t it be easier and safer to treat now and not take the chance of putting people at undue risk?
Authors: J. Vanhommerig et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Dec 15;59(12):1678-85. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu695. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
Eighteen of the patients were re-infected with a different strain than the initial one and developed a surge in both antibodies and HCV RNA. The researchers believed that one patient was re-infected three separate times after the first successful treatment.
Editorial Comments: I couldn’t find the entire journal article to find out what type of counseling efforts were offered to the study participants. This study, however, should remind us we need to educate people about prevention measures. But what was interesting is that 8 people had undetectable antibody titers in this small study. On a personal note, I did a demonstration of an HCV antibody test. I was cured of hepatitis C more than 10 years ago. The results showed very low reactive results. I wonder if my antibody titers will become undetectable after time. This study made me wonder how many ‘Baby Boomers’ became infected many years ago, naturally cleared the virus, and when tested recently had antibody titers too low to register.
http://hcvadvocate.org/news/newsLetter/2015/advocate0115_mid.html#3
No comments:
Post a Comment