Welcome to HCV Advocate’s hepatitis blog. The intent of this blog is to keep our website audience up-to-date on information about hepatitis and to answer some of our web site and training audience questions. People are encouraged to submit questions and post comments.

For more information on how to use this blog, the HCV drug pipeline, and for more information on HCV clinical trials
click here

Be sure to check out our other blogs: The HBV Advocate Blog and Hepatitis & Tattoos.


Alan Franciscus

Editor-in-Chief

HCV Advocate



Showing posts with label genotype 1a. Show all posts
Showing posts with label genotype 1a. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 13, 2015

SNAPSHOTS —Alan Franciscus, Editor-in-Chief

This month’s (October 2015) column features a variety of studies, including treatment of people with advanced liver disease, treating people who have not achieved a cure with direct acting antiviral therapy, including people who had developed RAVs.

Article:  Ledipasvir and Sofosbuvir Plus Ribavirin for Treatment of HCV Infection in Patients With Advanced Liver Disease—M Charlton et al. 

Source:  Gastroenterology. 2015 Sep;149(3):649-59. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 May 15.

Results and Conclusions
This was a phase 2 study of 337 patients with decompensated cirrhosis with genotype 1 (332 patients) and genotype 4 (5 patients) who received 12 or 24 weeks of Harvoni plus ribavirin twice daily.  None of the patients previously treated developed resistance to sofosbuvir.  People who had been previously treated with an NS5A inhibitor were excluded from the study. 

There were two groups in the study:
  •  Group A, who had NOT had a liver transplant: 59 patients with Child-Pugh class B cirrhosis and 49 patients with Child-Pugh class C  cirrhosis*
  •  Group B who HAD undergone liver transplantation:  111 patients without cirrhosis, 51 patients with Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis, 52 with Child-Pugh class B cirrhosis, 9 with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis, and 6 with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis*

 *Child-Pugh cirrhosis scoring is a system that uses various types of blood markers and liver disease progression such as ascites to evaluate a patient to establish the severity of cirrhosis and long-term patient survival.  The classes are A, B and C with A as the less severe and C as the most severe.  Cholestatic hepatitis is bile duct blockage with fibrosis.

Group A and B had 12- and 24-week treatment arms, but cure rates were similar regardless of treatment duration.
     
 The Bottom Line
In group A (those who had not received a liver transplant), the cure rate was 86% to 89%.  In group B (transplant group) the people who did not have cirrhosis or Class A cirrhosis—the cure rate was 96% to 98%.  Furthermore, in group B with class B cirrhosis (compensated) the cure rate was 85% to 88%, and those with class C cirrhosis (moderate impairment) achieved 60% to 75% cure rates. The people who had fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis achieved 100% cure rates.  There were 13 patients (4%) who discontinued treatment.  Ten patients died in the trial.  The deaths were mainly attributed to complications from hepatic decompensation or end-stage liver disease.

Editorial Comment
In the past, people with these types of severe disease progression have been very difficult to cure or even treat, but now with these ‘miracle’ drugs many people now have a second chance at life.  Now if we could just get these drugs to everyone with hepatitis C before this stage, we would eliminate the need to treat at these stages of disease severity. 

___________

Article:  Grazoprevir and elbasvir plus ribavirin for chronic HCV genotype-1 infection after failure of combination therapy containing a direct-acting antiviral agent—X Forns et al.

Source:  J Hepatol. 2015 Sep;63(3):564-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.009. Epub 2015 Apr 18.

Results and Conclusions
There were 79 HCV genotype 1 patients in the study. 
  • Sixty-six patients who had been previously treated patients with an NS3/4A protease inhibitor but had not been cured. 
  • Of the 13 remaining patients, 12 had discontinued treatment due to side-effect(s). 
  • Thirty-four patients had NS3 resistance-associated variants (RAVs), and eight patients had NS5A RAVs. 
  • Eight patients treated with the combination of grazoprevir and elbasvir plus ribavirin twice daily.

 The Bottom Line
The overall cure rates were 96% (76 of 79 patients)—this included 93% (63 of 66 patients) of the genotype 1a, one hundred percent of the patients (43 of 43 patients) who DID NOT have RAVs achieved a cure.  Ninety-one percent of those who DID have NS3 RAV’s were cured and 75% (6 of 8 patients) of those who had NS5A RAVs were cured.  Of those with cirrhosis 94% were cured with this combination. 

Editorial Comment
The addition of ribavirin to grazoprevir and elbasvir works to help cure resistance-associated variants in people who have been previously treated but who have not been cured.  It is also good strategy to treat other negative predictors to current  medications.
____________________

Article:  Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus previously treated in clinical trials of sofosbuvir regimens—D Wyles et al.  

Source:  Hepatology. 2015 Jun;61(6):1793-7. doi: 10.1002/hep.27814. Epub 2015 Apr 27.

Results and Conclusions
There were 51 genotype 1 patients enrolled in the study (Note: one patient was incorrectly typed as genotype 1, but was subsequently correctly genotyped as genotype 3).  All of the patients in this trial were previously treated with a sofosbuvir containing regimes in Gilead’s phase 1 or phase 2 studies.  The treatment duration in this study was 12 weeks. 
Breaking it down by type of prior type of non-response:
  • 25 pts (49%) had previously received sofosbuvir plus pegylated interferon plus ribavirin
  • 20 pts (39%) had previously received sofosbuvir plus ribavirin
  • 5 pts (10%) received sofosbuvir (sugar pill/placebo) plus pegylated interferon and ribavirin
  • 1 pt (2%) received GS-0938 only fourteen patients (27%) had compensated cirrhosis.

 The Bottom Line
The total number of patients who achieved a cure was 98% (50 of 51 patients).  Among those who had received a prior course of sofosbuvir 98% (44 of 45) were cured.  The only patient who did not achieve a cure was the patient who was originally misdiagnosed as a genotype 1. 

The most common side effects were fatigue, headache and diarrhea.  The patients in this trial are considered some the most difficult to treat—those who have not achieved a cure with a previous course of a direct acting antiviral medication, those with cirrhosis, and people with resistant antiviral variants (RAVs). 

Editorial Comment
The addition of ledipasvir and ribavirin to sofosbuvir increased the cure rates to 100% for genotype 1.  Excellent results!  This is a good strategy with another type of direct acting antiviral to stop the virus from replicating and escaping.

Gilead, Merck, AbbVie, Janssen, and Achillion are working on other HCV drugs that have a higher barrier to resistance to avoid the development of resistance and to work for people who are not responding to the current medications.

Monday, September 28, 2015

September 2015 Mid-Month Edition - SNAPSHOTS —Alan Franciscus, Editor-in-Chief




This month’s Snapshots is about recently published studies on all-oral therapies to treat hepatitis C in people coinfected with HIV.  We have really come a long way in such a short period of time with medications to treat a population in high need of effective therapies.    
______

Article: Ledipasvir and Sofosbuvir for HCV in Patients Coinfected with HIV-1—S Naggie et al.

Source:  New England Journal of Medicine DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1501315

Results and Conclusions
The study included 335 patients coinfected with HIV-1 and hepatitis C genotype 1 or 4.  The median age was 52 yo (48-58 yo).  The majority of patients were White 61% (203 pts) and Black 34% (115 pts), male 82% (276), genotype 1a 75%, genotype 4 two percent, cirrhosis 20%, median CD 4+ cell count 628 (469-823), treatment naïve 45%, previously treated 55%. The treatment period was 12 weeks.  Note: I am not including the genotype 4 patients since there were only 8 patients.  

The Bottom Line
The cure rates were 96% for genotype 1a, and 96% for genotype 1b. The cure rates were similar regardless of prior response or degree of liver damage.  The most common side effects were headache, fatigue and diarrhea.  No patients discontinued treatment due to side effects.

Editorial Comment
These results are excellent across subtypes (1a/1b), races, and prior treatment responses.  Gilead has filed for marketing approval with the Food and Drug Administration.  The American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) recommend Harvoni as a treatment for HCV for people coinfected with HIV and hepatitis C.

_____

Article: Efficacy and safety of grazoprevir (MK-5172) and elbasvir (MK-8742) in patients with hepatitis C virus and HIV co-infection (C-EDGE CO-INFECTION): a non-randomised, open-label trial—J K Rockstroh, et al

Source:  The Lancet HIV Volume 2, No. 8, e319–e327, August 2015

Results and Conclusions
The study was conducted in people with HIV/HCV coinfection to evaluate grazoprevir/elbasvir (one pill, once-a-day) to treat HCV genotype 1, 4, and 6. The treatment period was 12 weeks. There were 218 patients in the phase 3 trial.  The trial was conducted in Europe, the United States and Australia.

The Bottom Line
The overall cure rate was 96% (210 of 218 patients).  All patients who had cirrhosis were cured.  The most common side effects were fatigue, headache and nausea. No patients discontinued treatment due to side effects.

Editorial Comment
The high cure rates and fewer side effects plus no treatment discontinuation due to treatment-related side effects equals very good news for patients.

The once-a-day combination of grazoprevir/elbasvir when approved is going to be a welcome addition to the other therapies to treat hepatitis C in people who are HIV and HCV coinfected.  

______

Article: Daclatasvir plus Sofosbuvir for HCV in Patients Coinfected with HIV-1—D L Wyles et al.  
Source:  New England Journal of Medicine DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503153

Results and Conclusions
There were 3 different treatment groups. All the groups received daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir. Note: Since there was a small number of genotype 2, 3, and 4 patients—I omitted these results.  For this article I am just listing the genotype 1 results.    

The Bottom Line
The patient characteristics, treatment durations and cure rates are included below:


  1. Naïve (untreated patients): 101 patients; median age 52 yo; male sex 91%; race: White 65%, Black 30%; genotype 1a: 70%, genotype 1b: 12%; cirrhosis 9%; median CD4+ count 520 (122-1147). Treatment duration = 12 weeks. Cure rate = 96%
  2. Naïve (untreated patients): 50 patients; median age 51 yo; male 84%; race White 56%, Black 38%; Genotype 1a 70%, Genotype 1b 12%; cirrhosis 10%; treatment duration = 8 weeks.  Cure rate = 76%
  3. Treatment Experienced:  52 patients; median age 57 yo; male 83%; race White 60%, Black 38%; genotype 1a 63%, genotype 1b 21%; cirrhosis 29%; treatment duration =12 weeks.  Cure rate = 98%

The most common side effects were fatigue, nausea, and headache.  No patient discontinued due to side effects.

Editorial Comment
The 12-week treatment groups had good cure rates as opposed to the 8-week treatment response group.  The treatment-experienced group #3 with a 38% Black population and a relatively high cirrhotic population achieved nearly perfect cure rates. The drawback of this combination is going to be the high price tag of the combination of these two drugs.

Note:  Another issue with treating hepatitis C in people with HIV is the potential drug-drug interactions with HIV medications.  For more information visit the AASLD/IDSA  HCV Guidelines http://www.hcvguidelines.org/full-report-view.